Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caveman Principles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Caveman Principles

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably not notable. Article was writen by the author who made few contributions other than promoting his book. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 18:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article doesn't seem to have ever cited any reviews in reliable sources or any other coverage, nor have I been able to find any. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.